Vilas Gangaram Shegle VS Telco Ltd. (Tata Motors Limited)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

INDER JIT SINGH, SADHNA SHANKER
Vilas Gangaram Shegle – Appellant
Versus
Telco Ltd. (Tata Motors Limited) – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: In Person
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Animesh Khandelwal, Advocate(through video conferencing)
For the Respondent No.2: Ex-parte

ORDER

Dr. Sadhna Shanker, Member—This revision petition under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails the order dated 22.12.2022 in first appeal I No.583 of 2006 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra (in short, the ‘State Commission’) vide which the appeal of the respondent/opposite party was allowed and the Order dated 16.02.2006 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (in short, the ‘District Forum’) in Consumer Complaint No.152 of 2003 was set aside.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the ‘complainant’) and learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and perused the record. Respondent No.2 was proceeded ex parte vide order dated 06.01.2025.

3. The brief facts of the case are that on 08/12/1999, the complainant paid an amount of Rs.1,62,770/- to the respondent No.1 towards the purchase of a truck bearing Registration No.MH-07-643. The respondent No.1 is the manufacturer of the said vehicle while the opposite party No.2 is its authorized dealer. The total cost of the truck was Rs.6,77,665/-. The balance amount was financed by respondent No.1 and a Hire Purchase

Click Here to Read the rest of this document