JUDGMENT :

1. RULE. Learned AGP, learned advocate Mr.Munshaw and learned advocate Ms.Solanki waive service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respective respondents.

2. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in respect of challenging the action of the respondent authorities appointing the respondent No.4 on the post of Anganwadi Worker in Chandana Muvada Anganwadi, Taluka Dehgam, District Gandhinagar, instead of the petitioner.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that though she is having more merits than the respondent No.4, no appointment order has been issued in her favour.

4. Learned advocate Mr.Prasad appearing for the petitioner has submitted that when the petitioner inquired about her non-appointment and the appointment of the respondent No.3 was issued by the respondent authority by communication dated 20.10.2020, she was informed that her application for appointment to the post of Anganwadi worker has not been approved as she has only produced the Semester mark-sheet of the Diploma course, which was not required or called