Back
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Jinalben Murlidhar Shastri – Appellant
Versus
Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By way of present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :
Amendment carried out as per Hon’ble Court’s order dated 31.01.2019
(A1) This Hon’ble Court may be please to hold and declare that policy of compassionate appointment of the respondent company under clause 9 of GSO 295 to the extent of it excluding a married daughter from the purview of compassionate app
Denying compassionate appointment to a married daughter is discriminatory and unconstitutional under GSO 295 and constitutional provisions.
Compassionate appointments cannot discriminate based on gender; excluding married daughters violates constitutional rights under Articles 14, 15, and 16.
Exclusion of married daughters from compassionate appointment violates Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution, affirming that marriage does not sever familial ties for employment eligibility.
Married daughters are entitled to compassionate appointment on par with sons, as marital status does not negate their familial ties or dependency.
Married daughters are entitled to compassionate appointment, and discrimination based on marital status violates Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution.
Sole surviving married daughter entitled to compassionate appointment; rejection on being only survivor, parental employment, pensions, or settlement dues unsustainable without proper financial asses....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
