SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 1355

NIKHIL S. KARIEL
BANSIDHAR S. PARMAR – Appellant
Versus
B. S. PATEL – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: DEEPAK M. SHAH, RAJAN D. SHAH
For the Respondents: HARDIK SONI, H.S. MUNSHAW

JUDGMENT :

NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J.

1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Manan Paneri on behalf of the learned Advocate Mr. Deepak M. Shah, learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Hardik Soni on behalf of the respondent no. 2 and learned Advocate Mr. H.S. Munshaw for the respondent nos. 1, 3 and 4.

2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought to assail an order passed by the respondent no. 6-Gujarat State Land Development Corporation dated 03.09.2007 confirmed vide order dated 24.12.2007, more particularly, whereby the petitioner has been imposed with punishment of being placed in the lowest scale in the cadre of Head Clerk for a period of one year without future effect.

3. Learned Advocate Mr. Paneri would submit that in the present case, the petitioner has been punished after a departmental inquiry for charges for which the petitioner had faced an inquiry which has resulted in issuance of a warning to the petitioner. Learned Advocate Mr. Paneri would submit that originally a Charge-sheet has been issued to the present petitioner on 05.11.2004, inter-alia, alleging violation of Rule 3(1)(3) and Rule 3(A) of the Gujarat Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1971. Learned Advocate for the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top