SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 31

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
NAWAZSHARIF YASINMIYA THAKOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE CHARGESHEET) NO. 4517 of 2025



Petitioner Advocates:MR. JAVED S QURESHI(6999) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Discretionary bail may be granted based on the nature of allegations, even amidst ongoing investigations, provided suitable conditions are imposed.

Headnote:

(A) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023 - Section 483 - Application for regular bail - The applicant sought bail in connection with an FIR for alleged cow slaughter - The prosecution contended active involvement and ongoing investigation - Court found prima facie grounds for bail, emphasizing discretion in such matters. (Paras 2, 4, 7)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The court imposed conditions to ensure the applicant does not misuse liberty or obstruct the investigation. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was found at the scene of cow and calf slaughter with beef in possession, but had no prior criminal record.

Findings of Court:
The court deemed the case suitable for bail, allowing the applicant to be released under certain conditions.

Issues: The main issues included the nature of the allegations and the appropriateness of granting bail amidst ongoing investigations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that discretion should be exercised in granting bail based on the nature of allegations, without delving into evidence at this stage.

Result: The present application is allowed.

ORDER :

M. R. MENGDEY, J.

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent- State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No. 11215040250040 of 2025 registered with Bhalej Police Station, Anand.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the investigation of the offence is still in progress. The applicant was actively involved in commission of the offence in question. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. As per the case of prosecution, an information was received by the police authorities that a cow and a calf had been slaughtered at some place and the police authorities had raided the premises on the basis of the said information, wherein the present applicant was found present. The beef worth 35 kg was also found at the place in question. The applicant does not have any other antecedent.

6. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012]1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamperthe police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.; (f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

9. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

11. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

12. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. 

Direct service is permitted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top