SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 31

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
NAWAZSHARIF YASINMIYA THAKOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR. JAVED S QURESHI(6999) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

M. R. MENGDEY, J.

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent- State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.No. 11215040250040 of 2025 registered with Bhalej Police Station, Anand.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the investigation of the offence is still in progress. The applicant was actively involved in commission of the offence in question. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. As per the case of prosecution, an information was received by the police authorities that a cow and a calf had been slaughtered at some place and the police authorities had raided the premises on the basis of the said information, wherein the present applicant was found present. The beef worth 35 kg was also found

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top