SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 38

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
MAHAMMAD VAASIM MANSURMIYA IJAJODDIN MALEK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR NADEEM B MANSURI(11332) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. learned advocate appearing on behalf (Para 3)
2. learned app appearing on behalf (Para 4)
3. while granting bail, the court (Para 5)
4. i have heard the learned advocates (Para 6 , 7)
5. in the facts and circumstances (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
6. rule is made absolute (Para 12)

ORDER :

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11215006240381 of 2024 registered with Borsad City Police Station, District Anand for the offences punishable under Sections 299, 325, 61(2) (A) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) and section 8(2) of the Gujarat Animal (Prevention) Act, 1954.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and submitted that, one Lalitaben is owner of cow and she has handed over the cow to one Mukeshbhai and without her consent, it was subsequently sold to the co-accused, who slaughtered the cow and thrown its head in the canal. Sufficient material is collected during investigation. Therefore, he requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail looking to the n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top