HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
MAHAMMAD VAASIM MANSURMIYA IJAJODDIN MALEK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. learned advocate appearing on behalf (Para 3) |
| 2. learned app appearing on behalf (Para 4) |
| 3. while granting bail, the court (Para 5) |
| 4. i have heard the learned advocates (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. in the facts and circumstances (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. rule is made absolute (Para 12) |
ORDER :
2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11215006240381 of 2024 registered with Borsad City Police Station, District Anand for the offences punishable under Sections 299, 325, 61(2) (A) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) and section 8(2) of the Gujarat Animal (Prevention) Act, 1954.
4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and submitted that, one Lalitaben is owner of cow and she has handed over the cow to one Mukeshbhai and without her consent, it was subsequently sold to the co-accused, who slaughtered the cow and thrown its head in the canal. Sufficient material is collected during investigation. Therefore, he requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail looking to the n
Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; pretrial detention should not equate to conviction, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld, especially when trial proceedings will take time.
Bail is the rule and jail the exception, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21, especially when pre-trial detention amounts to wrongful conviction.
Discretionary bail may be granted based on the nature of allegations, even amidst ongoing investigations, provided suitable conditions are imposed.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must consider the nature of accusations and the presumption of innocence when granting bail.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception, emphasizing personal liberty and the need for careful consideration of the accused's circumstances.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld unless justified otherwise.
The court emphasized that bail is a rule and pre-trial detention is an exception, affirming the presumption of innocence and personal liberty under Article 21.
The principle of bail as a rule and jail as an exception is upheld, emphasizing personal liberty and the presumption of innocence.
The court emphasized that bail is a rule and pre-trial detention is an exception, prioritizing personal liberty and the absence of evidence against the accused.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.