Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
TAIYYAB MOHAMMED BHAIJAMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
M. R. MENGDEY, J.
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.
2. This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11207002240556 of 2024 registered with Godhara Town ‘B’ Division Police Station, District Panchmahal.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State has vehemently submitted that the applicant caught red-handed with 618 kgs beef and the said beef had been derived by the present applicant by slaughtering his cow. The applicant is having two other antecedents. Learned APP has, therefore, submitted that the offences which have been charged, are serious in nature and looking to the facts as well as the allegations levelled against the applicant, no discretion is required to be exercised.
5. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and perused the material available on record. From the record it appears that the investigation is ov
The court emphasized the balance between individual liberty and public interest in bail applications, allowing bail based on the completion of investigation and the nature of allegations.
The court may grant bail considering the nature of the offence, completion of investigation, and risk of flight, imposing necessary conditions to ensure compliance.
The court established that bail may be granted based on the nature of allegations, custody duration, and precedents, emphasizing judicial discretion in such matters.
Bail can be granted considering the nature of the offence, provided conditions are imposed to ensure presence and compliance during the trial.
The court granted bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and ensure the applicant's presence during t....
The court may grant bail under Section 483 considering the nature of the offence, the applicant's antecedents, and the need to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on the completion of investigation and the applicant's custody status, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
Discretionary bail may be granted based on the nature of allegations, even amidst ongoing investigations, provided suitable conditions are imposed.
The court established the criteria for bail consideration under Section 483, emphasizing the need for lawful conduct and compliance with trial procedures.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
