SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 204

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
TAIYYAB MOHAMMED BHAIJAMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 4824 of 2025



Petitioner Advocates:MR MOHAMMED ARKAM G SHAIKH(9840) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court emphasized the balance between individual liberty and public interest in bail applications, allowing bail based on the completion of investigation and the nature of allegations.

Headnote:

(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 483 - Application for regular bail in connection with serious offences regarding possession of beef - The applicant was caught red-handed with 618 kgs of beef derived from slaughtering a cow. The court considered the nature of the offence, the applicant's antecedents, and the completion of the investigation before granting bail. (Paras 4, 5, 6, 7)

(B) Bail - Factors for consideration - The court evaluated prima facie case, likelihood of the applicant fleeing, and potential tampering with witnesses as per established legal principles. (Paras 6)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was arrested for possessing 618 kgs of beef, allegedly obtained by slaughtering his cow, with prior antecedents noted. The investigation was complete, and a charge-sheet had been filed.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the applicant should be granted bail, considering the nature of the allegations and the completion of investigation. The applicant was ordered to be released on bail with specific conditions.

Issues: The main issues were the seriousness of the offence, the applicant's antecedents, and the appropriateness of granting bail under the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the applicant's detention was no longer warranted given the completion of the investigation and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing the need to balance individual liberty with public interest.

Result: Application allowed; the applicant is ordered to be released on bail under specified conditions.

ORDER :

M. R. MENGDEY, J.

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.

2. This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11207002240556 of 2024 registered with Godhara Town ‘B’ Division Police Station, District Panchmahal.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State has vehemently submitted that the applicant caught red-handed with 618 kgs beef and the said beef had been derived by the present applicant by slaughtering his cow. The applicant is having two other antecedents. Learned APP has, therefore, submitted that the offences which have been charged, are serious in nature and looking to the facts as well as the allegations levelled against the applicant, no discretion is required to be exercised.

5. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and perused the material available on record. From the record it appears that the investigation is over and Charge-sheet has already been filed. As per the case of prosecution, the applicant was found in possession of 618 kgs beef. Having regard to the nature of offence and allegations levelled against the present applicant, the present application deserves to be allowed.

6. This court has also considered the following aspects:

(a) As per catena of decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court, there are mainly 3 factors which are required to be considered by this court i.e. prima facie case, availability of Applicant accused at the time of trial and tampering and hampering with the witnesses by the accused.

(b) That the learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant Accused is not likely to flee away.

(c) That the Applicant is in custody since 24.10.2024.

(d) The law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. C.B.I. Reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations made in the FIR and without discussing the evidence in details as well as without going into details, prima-facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence, the application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR, on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that;

(a) shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.

(b) shall maintain law and order and not to indulge in any criminal activities.

(c) shall furnish the documentary proof of complete, correct and present address of residence to the Investigating Officer and to the Trial Court at the time of executing the bond and shall not change residence without prior permission of the trial Court.

(d) shall provide contact numbers as well as the contact numbers of the sureties before the Trial Court. In case of change in such numbers inform in writing immediately to the trial Court.

(e) shall file an affidavit stating immovable properties whether self acquired or ancestral with description, location and present value of such properties before the Trial Court, if any.

(f) shall not leave India without prior permission of the Trial Court (g) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week. If accused does not possess passport, shall file an Affidavit to that effect.

(h) shall mark presence before the concerned police station once in a month for a period of six months between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.

(i) shall not enter the area of Go

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top