SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 85

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
PAPPU S/O KALUBHAI SHERUBHAI KANJAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR. UTSAV H RAVAL(14345) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1.  RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11199060240262 of 2024 registered with Panoli Police Station, District Bharuch for the offences punishable under Sections 392, 394, 395, 397 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “ IPC ”) and section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act.

3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and now nothing is required to be recovered or discovered as the charge-sheet is filed. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail on the ground that applicant is having three past antecedents and if released then he may indulge in similar illegal activities. Therefore, he has requested to dismiss the prese

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top