HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
PAPPU S/O KALUBHAI SHERUBHAI KANJAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11199060240262 of 2024 registered with Panoli Police Station, District Bharuch for the offences punishable under Sections 392, 394, 395, 397 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “ IPC ”) and section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act.
3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and now nothing is required to be recovered or discovered as the charge-sheet is filed. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail on the ground that applicant is having three past antecedents and if released then he may indulge in similar illegal activities. Therefore, he has requested to dismiss the prese
Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
The principle of bail as a rule and jail as an exception is upheld, emphasizing personal liberty and the presumption of innocence.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception, emphasizing personal liberty and the need for careful consideration of the accused's circumstances.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld unless substantial grounds exist to deny bail.
Bail is the rule, and pre-trial detention should not equate to conviction, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21.
Bail is the rule and jail the exception, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21, especially when pre-trial detention amounts to wrongful conviction.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld unless justified otherwise.
The court emphasized that bail is a rule and pre-trial detention is an exception, affirming the presumption of innocence and personal liberty under Article 21.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; considerations for granting bail include nature of accusations and absence of past criminal record.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must consider the nature of accusations and the presumption of innocence when granting bail.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; pre-trial detention is unjustified when significant delays in prosecution occur.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.