HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
DHANJIBHAI KHENGARBHAI CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 1160 of 2025
(A) Gujarat Prohibition Act - Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 98(2) - Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Application for regular bail - Applicant claimed innocence and substantial investigation completed - Court considered factors for bail including nature of accusation and public interest - Bail granted with conditions. (Paras 5, 6, 7, 8)
(B) Bail Jurisprudence - Principle that bail is a rule and jail is an exception - Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution emphasized. (Paras 7, 8)
Facts of the case:
The applicant sought bail in connection with FIR for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, asserting innocence and completion of investigation. The applicant had been in custody since 25.10.2024.
Findings of Court:
The Court found that keeping the applicant in custody amounted to pre-trial conviction and granted bail considering the principles of bail jurisprudence.
Issues: The main issues included the nature of the allegations and the applicant's involvement in the alleged offence.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the applicant's continued detention was unjustified given the completion of investigation and the principle that bail should be the norm, not the exception.
Result: Application for bail allowed.
ORDER :
1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11213092240472 of 2024 registered with Atkot Police Station, District : Rajkot Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81 and 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and Sections 111(3) and 111(4) of the BNS.
3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and the allegations against the present applicant is that he is driver from his conscious possession, muddamal is recovered. Nothing is required to be recovered and discovered from the accused. Substantial part of the investigation is over. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and submitted that applicant is involved in similar type of activity. Hence, he has requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.
5. While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (I) the nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv) character behavior and standing of the accused and the circumstances which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.
6. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects have been considered:
(1) Substantial part of investigation is over and charge sheet is filed ;
(2) Applicant is behind the bars since 25.10.2024;
(3) Nothing is required to be recovered and discovered from the accused;
(4) considering the fact that three similar type of offence is registered against him but he is already acquitted; whereas co-accused has also been enlarged by this Court.
7. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978) 1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration.
8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11213092240472 of 2024 registered with Atkot Police Station, Distri
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld unless justified otherwise.
Bail is the rule, and pre-trial detention should not equate to conviction, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception, emphasizing personal liberty and the need for careful consideration of the accused's circumstances.
Bail is the rule and jail the exception, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21, especially when pre-trial detention amounts to wrongful conviction.
The principle of bail as a rule and jail as an exception is upheld, emphasizing personal liberty and the presumption of innocence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.