SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 194

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
DHANJIBHAI KHENGARBHAI CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR. KUSH N. BAVISHI(14121) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1.  RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11213092240472 of 2024 registered with Atkot Police Station, District : Rajkot Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81 and 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and Sections 111(3) and 111(4) of the BNS.

3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant  submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely  implicated in the offence and the allegations against the  present applicant is that he is driver from his conscious  possession, muddamal is recovered. Nothing is required to be  recovered and discovered from the accused. Substantial part of  the investigation is over. He therefore submits that, considering  the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on  regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State  has opposed the present application and submitted that  applicant is involved in similar type of activity. Hence, he has  requeste

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top