HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
IDRA @ UDESING KADIYABHAI DAMOR (TAHED) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. learned advocate appearing on behalf (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. learned app appearing on behalf (Para 4) |
| 3. while granting bail, the court (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. this court has also taken into consideration (Para 7) |
| 5. in the facts and circumstances (Para 8) |
| 6. the authorities will release (Para 9) |
| 7. bail bond to be executed (Para 10) |
ORDER :
2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being I-C.R. No.68 of 2001 registered with Limkheda Police Station, Dahod for the offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. Therefore, the present application may be dismissed.
6. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects have been considered:
(2) The offence was registered in the year 2001 whereas the applicant was arrested on 14.10.2024;
(4) Now, nothing is required to be discovered or recovered from the accused and there is no pos
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; pre-trial detention is unjustified when significant delays in prosecution occur.
Bail is the rule, and pre-trial detention should not equate to conviction, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception, emphasizing personal liberty and the need for careful consideration of the accused's circumstances.
Bail is the rule and jail the exception, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21, especially when pre-trial detention amounts to wrongful conviction.
The principle of bail as a rule and jail as an exception is upheld, emphasizing personal liberty and the presumption of innocence.
The court emphasized that bail is a rule and pre-trial detention is an exception, prioritizing personal liberty and the absence of evidence against the accused.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld unless justified otherwise.
The court emphasized that bail is a rule and pre-trial detention is an exception, affirming the presumption of innocence and personal liberty under Article 21.
Bail is a rule, and jail is an exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be prioritized, especially when the investigation is complete and trial is delayed.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; lack of corroborative evidence justifies granting bail under personal liberty principles.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.