SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 348

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
AJAYSINH @ GOTI S/O. GIRIRAJSINH RANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:S D MANSURI(7509) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. applicant claims innocence (Para 3)
2. state opposes bail application (Para 4)
3. factors for granting bail (Para 5)
4. consideration of case facts (Para 6)
5. bail granted (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
6. trial court's discretion (Para 11)
7. rule made absolute (Para 12)

ORDER :

2. The present successive bail application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11191035240223 of 2024 registered with Naroda Police Station, Ahmedabad, for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and submitted that, the applicant was having clear motive to commit the offence, when the applicant was in jail, the deceased, who happened to be mother-in-law of the applicant, had performed marriage of wife of the applicant with someone else and therefore, by keeping the grudge, the applicant has committed murder of the deceased. Therefore, if he is released on bail, possibility cannot be ruled out to tamper with the evidence and hamper the witnesses. Therefore, application does not deserve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top