SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 385

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
SAMIRKUMAR BHOLAJI PANDOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR VISHVAJITSINH D CHAUHAN(10160) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. learned advocate appearing on behalf (Para 3)
2. learned app appearing on behalf (Para 4 , 5)
3. i have heard the learned advocates (Para 6 , 7)
4. in the facts and circumstances (Para 8)
5. the authorities will release the applicant (Para 9)
6. bail bond to be executed (Para 10 , 11)
7. rule is made absolute (Para 12)

ORDER :

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11188007240743 of 2024 registered with Meghraj Police Station, Aravalli for the offences punishable under Sections 121(2), 125(a), 189(5), 190, 191(2), 324(4) and 191 (3) of BNS and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application on the ground that the dispute arose between two communities and assaulted each other. He further submitted that the incident happened in mob and subsequent overtact is not revealed. The other members of the mob are yet to identify and therefore requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

6. I have hea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top