SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 57

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
RAKESH CHAMPAKLAL CYCLEWALA @ MODI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:RAFIK LOKHANDWALA(5590) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11210030240885 of 2024 registered with Mahidharpura Police Station, Surat City, for the offence under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and Sections 144(2) and 61(2) of the BNS.

3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence. Chargesheet has been filed. The applicant has no past antecedent. Role of the applicant is that, the applicant is an owner of the guest house and he has facilitated the illegal activity. In such circumstances and considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and submitted that, the applicant is broker and six ladies were found during raid and sufficient material is collected against the applicant and he was owner of the Vijay Gu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top