SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 37

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
HITESHBHAI BABUBHAI VANKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR. NILAY A THAKER(7275) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. no objection for bail (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. application for bail filed (Para 4)
3. falsely implicated (Para 5 , 8)
4. opposed grant of bail (Para 6)
5. consideration for bail (Para 7)
6. bail jurisprudence (Para 9)
7. application allowed (Para 10)
8. release conditions (Para 11)
9. bail bond execution (Para 12)

ORDER :

2. He is permitted to file his appearance.

4. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11821005230807 of 2023 registered with Devgadh Bariya Police Station, Dahod for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2-n) and 376(3) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “ IPC ”) / The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act.

6. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. Therefore, the present application may be dismissed.

8. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects have been considered:

(2) Inves

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top