HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
AJAYKUMAR SATISHBHAI SISODIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Rule. Ld. APP waives Rule for the respondent-State.
2. The present successive bail application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11204046240712 of 2024 registered with Nadiad Town Police Station, Kheda, for the offence under Sections 318(4) and 54 of BNS.
3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence. Investigation is over and chargesheet has been filed. The applicant is arrested on 16.09.2024. The offence is triable by JMFC and therefore, he prays that the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and submitted that, the applicant is having similar nature of past antecedents. Presence of the applicant is recorded in CCTV footage and he is identified by the victim. Further, the applicant belongs to Uttar Pradesh and if he is released on bail, possibility cannot be ruled out to jump the trial. He has also submitted that, other co-accused are yet
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld unless substantial grounds exist to deny bail.
The principle of bail as a rule and jail as an exception is upheld, emphasizing personal liberty and the presumption of innocence.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception, emphasizing personal liberty and the need for careful consideration of the accused's circumstances.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must consider the nature of accusations and the presumption of innocence when granting bail.
The court emphasized that bail is a rule and pre-trial detention is an exception, affirming the presumption of innocence and personal liberty under Article 21.
Bail is the rule and jail the exception, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21, especially when pre-trial detention amounts to wrongful conviction.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; lack of corroborative evidence justifies granting bail under personal liberty principles.
Bail is the rule, and pre-trial detention should not equate to conviction, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; considerations for granting bail include nature of accusations and absence of past criminal record.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld unless justified otherwise.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.