SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 494

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
NILESHBHAI RANABHAI MODHVADIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR ASHISH M DAGLI(2203) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

Registry to accept vakalatnama of learned advocates Mr. J.L. Chan and Mr. Mohsin Koreja, who have instructions to appear for the original complainant.

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

2. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11191036240227 of 2024 registered with Navrangpura Police Station, Ahmedabad City for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2) and 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”).

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and he is falsely enroped in the offence. Now nothing remains to be recovered or discovered from the present applicant and pursuant to issuance of notice, applicant has joined the investigation. Further, he is ready and willing to remain present before the I.O, if required. Therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. In view of the ab

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top