SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 894

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -
AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 4512 of 2025 ==========================================================
PREMCHAND DIPABHAI KALARA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. MAULIK M SONI(7249) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR MEET THAKKAR, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 26/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MR. MAULIK M SONI(7249) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Prolonged incarceration and completion of investigation justified granting bail, subject to conditions to protect prosecution interests.

Headnote:(A) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023 - Section 483 - Application for regular bail in a double murder case - The applicant was found in possession of looted items from the deceased's house - The investigation is complete, and a charge-sheet has been filed - The applicant has been in custody since 20.01.2022 - The court considered the prolonged incarceration of co-accused and the law laid down in Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, [2012] 1 SCC 40 - The court found it appropriate to exercise discretion in favor of bail. (Paras 2, 5, 6, 7, 8)

(B) Bail Conditions - The applicant is to execute a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety, and comply with specific conditions to ensure the integrity of the investigation and prosecution. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is accused in a double murder case and has been in custody since January 2022. The application for bail was filed after the charge-sheet was submitted.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the prolonged incarceration warranted the granting of bail, subject to conditions to safeguard the investigation.

Issues: The main issues included the nature of the offence, the applicant's prolonged custody, and the appropriateness of bail under the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the prolonged incarceration of the applicant, along with the completion of the investigation, justified the granting of bail, emphasizing the need for conditions to protect the prosecution's interests.

Result: The present application is allowed.

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11203068220035 of 2022 registered with Vanthali Police Station, Junagadh.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the present is the case of double murder. Moreover, the application had been found in possession of muddamal looted from the house of the deceased. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. The applicant has been arrested in connection with the present offence on 20.01.2022 and since then the applicant is in custody. Recently, the Coordinate Bench of this Court has considered the case of co-accused viz. Mahesh Khumsing Bhuriya for grant of bail on the ground of prolonged incarceration. Having regard to the same, the present applicant is required to be released on the very ground.

6. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

9. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

11. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

12. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct service is permitted.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top