HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
RAMESHBHAI JIVABHAI SABAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant is innocent (Para 3) |
| 2. opposed the present application (Para 4) |
| 3. consider the involvement of the accused (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. fit case to exercise discretion (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORDER :
1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence. Investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. The injured/victim is discharged from the hospital and out of danger. Commencement of trial will take its own time. Whatever evidence is collected during the investigation, there is no possibility to tamper with the evidence. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
5. While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be taken into consideration while considering an applic
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; personal liberty must be upheld unless substantial evidence suggests otherwise.
Bail is the rule and jail the exception, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21, especially when pre-trial detention amounts to wrongful conviction.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception, emphasizing personal liberty and the need for careful consideration of the accused's circumstances.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception, emphasizing personal liberty under Article 21, especially when trial will take time and no recovery is pending.
The principle of bail as a rule and jail as an exception is upheld, emphasizing personal liberty and the presumption of innocence.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must consider the nature of accusations and the presumption of innocence when granting bail.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld unless justified otherwise.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be prioritized, considering the nature of accusations and the completion of investigations.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; personal liberty under Article 21 must be upheld in the absence of strong evidence against the accused.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; lack of corroborative evidence justifies granting bail under personal liberty principles.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.