SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 394

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
RAMESHBHAI JIVABHAI SABAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR Y J PATEL(3985) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. applicant is innocent (Para 3)
2. opposed the present application (Para 4)
3. consider the involvement of the accused (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. fit case to exercise discretion (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence. Investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. The injured/victim is discharged from the hospital and out of danger. Commencement of trial will take its own time. Whatever evidence is collected during the investigation, there is no possibility to tamper with the evidence. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

5. While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be taken into consideration while considering an applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top