SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 691

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
SANKAJI RANCHHODJI THAKOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:VIVEK M BRAHMBHATT(10076) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

At the outset, learned advocate for the applicants does not press the present application qua applicant No.1 and hence, present application is disposed of as not pressed qua applicant No.1 – SANKAJI RANCHHODJI THAKOR.

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State of Gujarat.

1. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”), the applicants accused have prayed to release them on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11216009240686 of 2024 registered with Mansa Police Station, District Gandhinagar for the offences punishable under Sections 409 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Learned advocate for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the offence only because they are members of the managing committee of the society and have committed negligence in performing their duty due to which the Secretary of the society has misappropriated Rs.47.11 lakh of the society with which the present applicants are not connected however, the applicants are ready and willing to join t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top