SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 813

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
MUSTAKBHAI @ MUSO MOHMMAD PAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR RUTURAJ NANAVATI(5624) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO.11193050240225 of 2024 registered with Rajula Police Station, Amreli.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the present applicant had actively participated in commission of the offence in question. The presence of the applicant has been captured in the C.C.T.V. footage and he is seen in the C.C.T.V. footages passing from the place of incident on a two wheeler. He further submitted that the applicant had assaulted the deceased with a stick and had inflicted several injuries to the deceased with the said stick. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. Learned advocate for the original complainant has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the present applicant herein had a strong motive for c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top