HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
IJV, SNB
DAYALSING KEVALSING SARDAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
ILESH J. VORA, J.
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent-State. By consent, Rule is fixed forthwith.
2. We have heard Ms. Tanaveer Loladia, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Krutik Parikh, learned APP for the respondent-State.
3. By way of this application under Section 430(1) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, applicant Dayalsing Kevalsing Sardar seeks suspension of sentence awarded to him by the Sessions Court concerned for the offence punishable under Section 302 and 34 of the IPC.
4. The present appeal and the application for suspension of sentence arise from the judgment dated 27.10.2023 and order of sentence passed in Sessions Case No.01 of 2022, whereby, the applicant herein was convicted and sentenced as under:
(i) Section 302 and 34 of IPC: R.I. for Life and fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default thereof, further imprisonment for 6 months;
5. Facts and circumstances giving rise to file present application are that, on 30.10.2021 at about 9:30 p.m., the accused Rohit has given a knife blow to the deceased Sikandar and the present applicant-accused had caught hold the deceased as the dispute with the accused Rohit arose for recovery
The mere presence of an accused does not imply shared intention to commit murder; suspension of sentence granted due to lengthy incarceration and fair chances of appeal.
The court may suspend a sentence if the conviction appears to be against the evidence and established legal principles.
The court ruled that the injuries inflicted were not intended to cause death, indicating culpable homicide rather than murder, thus justifying the suspension of sentence.
The court may suspend a sentence during the appeal process if the applicant has served a significant portion of the sentence and no exceptional circumstances exist to deny such suspension.
The principle of parity justifies the suspension of sentence when the roles of the accused are similar, allowing for appeal considerations.
The court may suspend a sentence if the applicant demonstrates insufficient evidence of involvement in the crime, allowing for bail pending appeal.
The principle of parity allows for the suspension of a sentence when the applicant's role in the crime is less severe than that of the principal accused.
The court emphasized that circumstantial evidence must unequivocally indicate guilt, and insufficient evidence warrants suspension of sentence.
Suspension of sentence granted due to contradictions in witness statements and lack of evidence linking the applicant to the crime.
The principle of parity allows for suspension of sentence when the roles of co-accused are considered, leading to a favorable decision for the applicant.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.