SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 910

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
IJV, SNB
DAYALSING KEVALSING SARDAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR CHINTAN S POPAT(5004) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

ILESH J. VORA, J.

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent-State. By consent, Rule is fixed forthwith.

2. We have heard Ms. Tanaveer Loladia, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Krutik Parikh, learned APP for the respondent-State.

3. By way of this application under Section 430(1) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, applicant Dayalsing Kevalsing Sardar seeks suspension of sentence awarded to him by the Sessions Court concerned for the offence punishable under Section 302 and 34 of the IPC.

4. The present appeal and the application for suspension of sentence arise from the judgment dated 27.10.2023 and order of sentence passed in Sessions Case No.01 of 2022, whereby, the applicant herein was convicted and sentenced as under:

(i) Section 302 and 34 of IPC: R.I. for Life and fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default thereof, further imprisonment for 6 months;

5. Facts and circumstances giving rise to file present application are that, on 30.10.2021 at about 9:30 p.m., the accused Rohit has given a knife blow to the deceased Sikandar and the present applicant-accused had caught hold the deceased as the dispute with the accused Rohit arose for recovery

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top