IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
NIKHIL S.KARIEL
Yogendrasinh Natvarsinh Rathod – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J.
1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Kaushal H. Patel for the petitioner, learned AGP Ms. Tanushree Shrimal for the respondent State and learned Advocate Mr. Nisarg N. Jani for the respondent No.2.
2. Issue Rule. Learned Advocates for the respective respondents waive service of Rule.
3. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.
4. At the outset, learned advocate for the petitioner would submit that the issue raised in this petition is covered by a decision of this Court in Special Civil Application No.10738 of 2020 and allied matters dated 14.03.2024 and whereas it is submitted that the said decision with a modification had been confirmed by the Division Bench. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner that since the petitioner is similarly situated to the petitioners of the above writ petitions, the same benefit as modified by the Division Bench, may be accorded to the present petitioner.
5. Learned AGP and learned advocate for the District Panchayat would not dispute the proposition as having been submitted by learned advocate for the petitioner.
6. It would appear that the petitioner before this Court, ha
Compassionate appointment beneficiaries must receive benefits, including regular pay-scale and arrears restricted to three years prior to filing petitions, ensuring equal treatment under the law.
Petitioners entitled to receive modified appointment orders with regular pay scales from the original appointment date, along with arrears for three years prior to filing of petitions.
The court reaffirmed the right to regular pay scale and benefits for compassionate appointments, limiting arrears to three years from filing date, establishing that past judicial decisions should gui....
Compassionate appointments must align with the applicable policies at the time of the deceased employee's death, and modifications for pay-scale and arrears must be applied uniformly among similarly ....
The court ruled that petitioners appointed on compassionate grounds are entitled to regular pay scale from their initial appointment date, alongside arrears for three years prior to filing petitions.
Court ruled compassionate appointments must offer regular pay from the date of appointment, ensuring parity for similarly situated individuals, reinforcing precedential authority over state policy ar....
The court affirmed that employees appointed on compassionate grounds are entitled to regular pay scales from the initial date of appointment, subject to a limit of three years for the payment of arre....
Employees appointed on compassionate grounds are entitled to regular pay scale from initial appointment date, with any delays in claims restricted to three years prior to petition filing.
Compassionate appointment claims must adhere to established policy principles and be granted uniformly to similarly situated individuals despite filing delays, with arrears limited to three years bef....
Petitioners, appointed on compassionate grounds, are entitled to regular pay scales and benefits consistent with earlier court decisions, regardless of the delay in their applications.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.