IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HEMANT M.PRACHCHHAK
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Gayatri Construction Co. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.
1. The present First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE , 1908 read with Section 41 of the CPC at the instance of the appellants – State Authorities being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 17.02.2000 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Valsad (herein after referred to as “the trial court”) in Special Civil Suit No. 159 of 1991, whereby, the learned Judge partly allowed the suit and directed the appellants to pay Rs.11,04,435/- to the respondent herein with 15% interest from the date of the suit till realization of the decreetal amount.
2. Brief facts leading to the present appeal are as under :-
2.1 The respondent was an engineer and Contractor and was registered with the Public works Department and also approved by various other department of the Government and carrying on his business of Contractor in the name of M/s. Gayatri Construction Co. It is the case of the appellant that the Executive Engineer, Navsari (R&B) division, Navsari, had invited tendors publicly on behalf of the Govt. of Gujarat, appellant herein for the work of constructing Regional Training Centre at Vansada and accordingly
A party's failure to perform crucial contractual obligations constitutes a fundamental breach, thereby entitling the other party to seek compensation, with appropriate adjustments on interest rates b....
State authorities are liable for breach of contract when failing to fulfill terms, allowing for the contractor to claim due payments and interest, subject to evidentiary support and stipulations.
Interest awarded by the trial court must be just and reasonable; the appellate court reduced the interest rate from 12% to 9%, upholding the damage assessment.
The court upheld the trial Court's decree for recovery of contract payments, emphasizing the contractor's timely completion of work and the defendants' failure to prove claims of substandard work.
The court upheld the plaintiff's claims for withheld payments under the contract, establishing entitlement based on completed work despite defendants' claims of substandard quality and modified the i....
The court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' suit for damages due to insufficient evidence and the contractor's failure to complete the work as per the contract.
A party may recover damages for breach of contract when the other party fails to fulfill its contract obligations, particularly regarding timely supply of materials.
Point of law: When the appeal is presented in terms of Section 96 CPC and when this Court is considering this appeal not only as a last Court of fact but also in terms of law, it is open for the appe....
The judgment clarified the jurisdiction of the Civil Court, the application of the Limitation Act, and the entitlement of the plaintiff to claim losses incurred due to non-cooperation from the defend....
The court upheld the Tribunal's award, emphasizing limited grounds for interference under Section 19, confirming the Tribunal's jurisdiction and decision-making process regarding construction claims.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.