Paktum Basar vs Lingdum Taki - 2022 Supreme(Gau) 1066

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Gau) 1066

KALYAN RAI SURANA, ROBIN PHUKAN
Paktum Basar – Appellant
Versus
Lingdum Taki – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR.R L Thungon

JUDGMENT :

R.Phukan, J

1. These six intra-Court appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 24.11.2016, passed by the learned Single Judge in (i) WP (C) 417 (AP)/2016 (Lingum Taki & 2 Ors. Vs. The State of A.P. & 3 Others, (ii) WP (C) 520 (AP)/2016 (Kanpong Wangphop & 24 Ors. Vs. The State of A.P. & 4 Others, and (iii) WP(C) 606(AP)/2016, (Hibu Raju & 12 Ors. Vs. The State of A.P. & 4 Others.

By the impugned judgment and order the learned Single Judge had allowed the aforementioned writ petitions and set aside and quashed (i) the Cabinet Decision dated 11.05.2016, (ii) W.T. Message dated 25.07.2016, and (iii) Order dated 15.07.2016, and further directed the State respondents to ensure that a ‘Limited Departmental Examination’ (LDE for short) is conducted to fill up the vacant posts of Head Constables that arose from 2010 onward and which are to be filled up by LDE as per Head Constables of Police (Group-‘C’ Posts) Recruitment Rules of 2010, (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules of 2010”) and further directed that writ petitioners (i.e. the private respondents herein) should also be allowed to take part in selection process, as permitted by Rules of 2010.

2. As com