IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH), (ITANAGAR BENCH)
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Shri Tachu Nabam And 77 Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The Union Of India, Represented By The Secretary, Ministry Of Road Transport And Highway, Govt. Of India and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) No.64 Of 2014
Decided On : 08-08-2022
Constitution of India, 1949 – Article 226 – Land Acquisition Act 1894 – Doctrine of Estoppel – Power of High Court to issue Certain Writs – Writ petitioners have prayed for directing respondent authorities to grant compensation to people of Khodaso Community pursuant Government of Arunachal Pradesh for acquisition of their community land for construction of Trans Arunachal Highway – Held, Court two individuals, having received award have not distributed same evenly amongst villagers apparent from list of beneficiaries additional affidavit as Annexure-E allegation against said two persons and a prayer is also being made by petitioners for constitution of a committee to enquire about irregularities – Court is of view that said two persons are necessary party non-impleadment caused dent to case of petitioners – Petition stands dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. In this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, Shri Tachu Nabam and 77 others, have prayed for directing the respondent authorities to grant compensation to the people of Khodaso Community, pursuant to notification, dated 11.12.2012, of the Government of Arunachal Pradesh for acquisition of their community land for construction of Trans Arunachal Highway from Khodaso to Hoj having a length of 102 kms and also to constitute an independent committee, headed by a person appointed by this Court along with the representative of Khodaso community for assessment and disbursement of compensation payable to the said community and also to enquire about the compensation granted to the selected 2 (two) individuals belonging to Khodaso community.
2. The factual background, leading to filing of the present petition, is briefly stated as under:
3. The respondent authorities have filed their affidavit-in-opposition denying the averments made in the petition. In their affidavit-in-opposition, respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4 stated that payments of compensation of Khodaso community does not arise at all as the said village does not fall under the jurisdiction of respondent No. 4 and that no assessment was done and the properties of the petitioners’ village falls in the jurisdiction of separate Dep
Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors. Vs. Harakchand Misirmal Solanki & Ors.
Point of Law : It is well settled that if a person has submitted to the jurisdiction of the Authority, he cannot challenge proceedings, on the ground of lack of jurisdiction of said authority in furt....
Section 3G of National Highways Act, 1956 provided for procedure for determination of amount payable as compensation.
The National Highway Act, 1956 provides for the acquisition of private properties for the construction of national highways, including the process of award declaration and compensation determination.....
The acquisition proceedings under Award No.12/83 were held not to lapse in terms of Sec. 24(2) of the RFCTLARR Act and they will continue.
If sub-section (2) of Section 3H of the Act of 1956 is looked into, the jurisdiction of the competent authority is nothing but to pay the compensation to the person or persons entitled thereto.
Disputes regarding compensation apportionment for land acquisition must be resolved by the Principal Civil Court, not through writ jurisdiction, when an alternative remedy exists.
Compensation for land acquisition must be determined under the New Act if awards are passed after its enactment, regardless of prior proceedings under the Old Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.