SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Gau) 1270

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, J.
Padma Kanta Borah, S/o. Late Dasarath Bora – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam, Represented By The Secretary To The Government Of Assam, Education (Secondary) Department And Anr. – Respondents
WP(C) No.6714 Of 2023
Decided On : 23-11-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. M. Das.

The legal right of a specially abled child to have the benefit of the care giver father without displacement due to the service conditions of the government employee.

Headnote:

Specially Abled Child - Government Employee's Posting - Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Office Memorandum dated 06.06.2014 - [Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Office Memorandum dated 06.06.2014] - The court recognized the legal right of a specially abled child to have the benefit of the care giver father without displacement due to the service conditions of the government employee. It emphasized that it is the legal right of the specially abled child to have the care giver father near for systematic rehabilitation, and directed the Director of Secondary Education, Assam to consider the representation of the petitioner in light of this legal right.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a government employee, was promoted and posted at a location different from his original posting, causing inconvenience to his specially abled child. The petitioner sought a transfer to be near his specially abled child.

Finding of the Court:

The court recognized the legal right of the specially abled child to have the benefit of the care giver father without displacement due to the service conditions of the government employee.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner, as a government employee, had the legal right to be posted near his specially abled child.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that it is the legal right of the specially abled child to have the care giver father near for systematic rehabilitation, and directed the Director of Secondary Education, Assam to consider the representation of the petitioner in light of this legal right.

Final Decision: The court directed the Director of Secondary Education, Assam to consider the representation of the petitioner in light of the legal right of the specially abled child and to pass a reasoned order within 15 days.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Ms. M. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Kaushik, learned counsel for the respondents in the Secondary Education Department.

2. The petitioner Padma Kanta Borah was initially serving as Planning Assistant in the office of the Inspector of Schools, Nagaon. By the order the Director of Secondary Education, Assam dated 22.07.2022, the petitioner was promoted to the post of Planning and Statistical Officer and upon promotion was posted in the office of the Inspector of Schools, Golaghat. It is stated that on 22.07.2022 when the petitioner was promoted to the post of Planning and Statistical Officer, no vacant post of Planning and Statistical Officer was available at Nagaon and accordingly for exigencies of service, the petitioner was required to be posted at Golaghat.

3. It is rather unfortunate that the petitioner is also the father of a specially abled child who is presently stated to be aged about 16 years. A certificate of the Director of Health Services, Nagaon, is available on record wherein the son of the petitioner, namely, Prachurjya Bora had been certified to be suffering from 50% permanent disability due to intellectual disability (moderate).

4. As per the certificate of disability, it is apparent that the son of the petitioner Prachurjya Bora is a specially abled child who requires special care and attention of the petitioner as the father. Upon promotion to the post of Planning and Statistical Officer at Golaghat, the son of the petitioner was inconvenienced to the extent that the ‘care giver father’ had to be separated from him because of his service conditions.

5. In the circumstance, the respondents by taking a sympathetic view had allowed the petitioner to be attached to the office of the Inspector of Schools, Nagaon. It is stated that in the meantime, one post of Planning and Statistical Officer in the office of the Inspector of Schools, Nagaon had fallen vacant and in the circumstance, the petitioner has made a representation dated 29.05.2023 making a prayer that he may be transferred and adjusted in the vacant post of Planning and Statistical Officer at Nagaon. It is also stated that at present, the post of Planning and Statistical Officer, Nagaon is vacant and no one is occupying the post. Although the petitioner had raised certain other assertions in the representation that his wife is also suffering from certain medical ailments and requires surgery, for the purpose of determining the present writ petition we are not required to go into such assertions. However, we take note that the petitioner is the father and care giver of a specially abled child who is certified to be suffering from 50% permanent disability due to intellectual disability (moderate).

6. The right of a specially abled child to have the comfort of a care giver father had been recognized by the Government of India in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions in the their office memorandum dated 06.06.2014, wherein it had been provided that there has been a demand that a Government employee who is the care giver of the disabled child may not have to suffer due to displacement by means of routine transfer/rotational transfers etc. and considering the matter in its entirety, the Government of India in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions in their office memorandum dated 06.06.2014 provided that in a case where a Government employee would be a care giver of a specially abled/disabled child, such employee should not be subjected to any displacement in course of his employment which may have a bearing on the systematic rehabilitation of the specially abled/disabled child. The said office memorandum dated 06.06.2014 is stated to have been also adopted by the Government of Assam.

7. In the instant case, it is taken note that the specially abled child of the petitioner is presently aged about 16 years and he has been provided the systemic rehabilitation under the facilities avail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top