Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Minnatulla Mazumder @ Ninnatulla Mazumder S/o Late Abdul Rakib Mazumder – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner and Secretary to the Department of School Education, Dispur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of compassionate appointment claim (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding status of compassionate appointment (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's reasoning on delay and legal principles from case law (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. critique of petitioner's conduct in litigation (Para 17) |
| 5. court's final decision and dismissal of petitions (Para 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
1. Both these writ petitions have been instituted by the same petitioner engaging different counsel. It is, however, pertinent to be mentioned that in the second writ petition, i.e, WP(C)/3115/2025, there is not even a whisper of the filing and pendency of the earlier writ petition, WP(C)/5588/2023. The subject matter involves a claim for appointment on compassionate ground.
2. The projected case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that his father, Abdul Rakib Mazumdar, who was working as a Hindi Teacher of Hussain Ahmed (Provincialized) MEM School under the District Elementary Education Officer (DEEO), Hailakandi had died in harness on 01.08.2009. The petitioner who claims to be eligible had applied for appointment on compassionate ground on 02.12.2009. However,
Compassionate appointment claims must be pursued without undue delay, as significant lags undermine the objective of immediate relief for bereaved families.
Compassionate appointments are an exception for immediate support to bereaved families, not a vested right, and must be considered without undue delay to fulfill their intended purpose.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to normal recruitment rules, not vested rights, and must satisfy immediate needs without prolonged delays affecting eligibility.
Compassionate appointments are not a vested right and must be granted promptly; delays undermine their purpose.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; significant delays undermine this purpose.
Compassionate appointment is meant for immediate relief to bereaved families and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as established by the Supreme Court.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays diminish the urgency of such claims.
Compassionate appointments must be sought immediately after the death of a government employee, as delays negate the intended relief purpose.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions meant for immediate relief and not vested rights; delays undermine their purpose.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
