IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Chimpi Gogoi D/o Late Horendra Nath Gogoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
1. The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging, inter alia the rejection of the case of petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground.
2. The projected case of the petitioner, in a nutshell is that her father, Horendra Nath Gogoi, who was working as Assistant Teacher at Rampur MV School in the district of Lakhimpur and had died in harness on 19.04.2016. The petitioner, who claims to be eligible, had applied for appointment on compassionate ground on 20.06.2016. However, the District Level Committee (DLC), Lakhimpur was not considering the same and was deferring such consideration. The petitioner claims that she had again approached the DEEO, Lakhimpur and was informed that her application was not traceable.
3. I have heard Shri S.U. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. I have also heard Shri B. Deuri, learned State Counsel and Shri B. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the non- consideration of the candidature of the petitioner is unreasonable and arbitrary. It is contended that the application for compassiona
Compassionate appointments are an exception for immediate support to bereaved families, not a vested right, and must be considered without undue delay to fulfill their intended purpose.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to normal recruitment rules, not vested rights, and must satisfy immediate needs without prolonged delays affecting eligibility.
Compassionate appointment is meant for immediate relief to bereaved families and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as established by the Supreme Court.
Compassionate appointments are not a vested right and must be granted promptly; delays undermine their purpose.
Compassionate appointments are intended for immediate relief and should not be claimed after significant delays, as urgency diminishes over time.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions meant for immediate relief and not vested rights; delays undermine their purpose.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays diminish the urgency of such claims.
Compassionate appointment claims must be pursued without undue delay, as significant lags undermine the objective of immediate relief for bereaved families.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; significant delays undermine this purpose.
Compassionate appointments must be sought immediately after the death of a government employee, as delays negate the intended relief purpose.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.