Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Dwipjyoti Patowary, S/o. Late Ranjit Patowary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Personal Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background and application timeline. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's analysis on delay in application. (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. arguments concerning delay and eligibility. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. legal framework concerning compassionate appointments. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. conclusion on the effect of delay. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 15 , 16) |
Order :
(SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.)
The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging, inter alia the non-consideration and appointment of the petitioner on compassionate ground.
2. The projected case of the petitioner, in a nutshell is that his father, Ranjit Patowary, who was working as a Constable under the Establishment of the Sr. Superintendent of Police, City Guwahati, Kamrup (M), had died in harness on 12.06.2008. The petitioner was stated to be a minor at the time of the death of his father. It has been averred that on attaining the age of majority, his mother had made an application which however was not responded to. Thereafter, his mother again applied for compassionate appointment of the petitioner vide application dated 11.05.2016. However, the petit
Compassionate appointments are intended for immediate relief and should not be claimed after significant delays, as urgency diminishes over time.
Compassionate appointments are an exception for immediate support to bereaved families, not a vested right, and must be considered without undue delay to fulfill their intended purpose.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to normal recruitment rules, not vested rights, and must satisfy immediate needs without prolonged delays affecting eligibility.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays diminish the urgency of such claims.
Compassionate appointments are intended for immediate relief and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as the sense of urgency is lost.
Compassionate appointment is meant for immediate relief to bereaved families and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as established by the Supreme Court.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions meant for immediate relief and not vested rights; delays undermine their purpose.
Compassionate appointments are not a vested right and must be granted promptly; delays undermine their purpose.
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and is meant to address immediate financial crises. The sense of immediacy is diluted and lost in cases of prolonged delay, and compassionate appointme....
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; significant delays undermine this purpose.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
