SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
D. STALIN – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl. MC No. 5127 of 2016
Decided On : 23-08-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: SUNNY ZACHARIAH.
For the Respondent: RENJITH T.R.

IMPORTANT POINT
A complaint under Section 340 Cr.P.C. is appealable under Section 341, and the existence of an alternative remedy precludes the use of extraordinary jurisdiction.

Headnote:

Quash - Criminal Complaint - Cr.P.C. Sections 340, 341 - The court interpreted Sections 340 and 341 of the Cr.P.C. to establish that a complaint made under Section 340 is subject to appeal under Section 341, thus denying the petitioner's request to quash the complaint due to the availability of an alternative remedy.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to quash a complaint filed against him under Section 340(1) of the Cr.P.C. for escaping lawful custody after being arrested under a civil warrant. The complaint was initiated by the court based on the Amin's report of the escape.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner had an alternative remedy available through an appeal under Section 341 of the Cr.P.C., making the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. not maintainable.

Issues: Whether the petition to quash the complaint under Section 340(1) of the Cr.P.C. is maintainable given the availability of an appeal under Section 341.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that when an alternative remedy exists, particularly an appeal under Section 341, the extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should not be invoked.

Result: The petition to quash the complaint was dismissed.

ORDER :

1. This criminal miscellaneous case is filed to quash Annexure-1 complaint, which is pending as S.T. No. 412/2010 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Kollam. It is a complaint filed based on an order passed under Section 340(1) read with Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short Cr.P.C.).

2. The case against the petitioner is that, he, being the judgment debtor in E.P.No. 231/2008 before the Principal Munsiff Court, Kollam, was arrested by the Amin of the Court on 24.08.2009 at 10 am in pursuance of the warrant issued by the learned Munsiff under Order XXI Rule 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure. After the arrest, he was brought to the nazarate by the Amin, but he ran away and escaped from the lawful custody of the Amin. The Amin could not successfully resist or take the custody of the petitioner. Subsequently on the same day, after the case was called in court, the petitioner surrendered before the Court at 2.30 pm. On his appearance, the decree holder deposited jail batta, and the petitioner was ordered by the learned Munsiff to be sent to civil jail for 30 days, for which his custody was given to the same Amin. Later, at around 3.40 pm, the Amin again reported that the petitioner escaped from his lawful custody and thus obstructed the lawful functioning of the Amin, a public servant functioning under the orders of the Court. On the basis of the report of the Amin, the learned Munsiff registered M.C. No. 3/2009 against the petitioner under Section 340(1) read with Section 195 Cr.P.C. After conducting the necessary enquiry, the learned Magistrate found that the offences under Sections 186, 225B and 353 IPC are made out. Hence Annexure-1 complaint was filed before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Kollam. Aggrieved by the same, this criminal miscellaneous case is filed.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. According to the petitioner, even if the entire allegations in Annexure-1 complaint are accepted, no offence is made out. Hence it is submitted that the continuation of Annexure-1 is an abuse of the process of the court.

5. This Court considered the contentions of the petitioner. I am of the considered opinion that a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against Annexure-1 complaint is not maintainable. Section 340 Cr.P.C. deals about the procedure in cases mentioned in Section 195 Cr.P.C. Section 341 Cr.P.C. deals about the appeal. It will be better to extract Section 341 Cr.PC:

“341. Appeal:

(1) Any person on whose application any Court other than a High Court has refused to make a complaint under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of Section 340, or against whom such a complaint has been made by such Court, may appeal to the Court to which such former Court is subordinate within the meaning of sub-section (4) of Section 195, and the superior Court may thereupon, after notice to the parties concerned, direct the withdrawal of the complaint, or, as the case may be, making of the complaint which such former Court might have made under Section 340, and if it makes such complaint, the provisions of that section shall apply accordingly.

(2) An order under this section, and subject to any such order, an order under Section 340, shall be final, and shall not be subject to revision.”

6. As per Section 341 Cr.P.C., an appeal is maintainable at the instance of the following persons:

(a) Any person on whose application any Court other than a High Court has refused to make a complaint under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of Section 340.

(b) Any person, against whom such a complaint has been made by such Court.

7. From the above it is clear that if a complaint has been made by a Court as per Section 340 Cr.P.C. the person against whom the complaint is filed has a right to file an appeal under Section 341 Cr.P.C. Section 341(2) Cr.P.C. says that, an order under this section, and subject to any such order, an order under Section 340, shall be final,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top