Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
V. Gopalakrishna Pillai S/o Late Vasudevan Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Thiruvananthapuram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background and loan application details. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding property rights and bank policy. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's evaluation of ownership validity. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final judgment ordering the bank to reconsider loan. (Para 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT :
M.A. ABDUL HAKHIM, J.
1. The petitioner is a senior citizen, aged 73 years. The petitioner applied for a loan of Rs.20 lakhs to respondents 1 to 3 under the Reverse Mortgage Loan Scheme, offering the property of 7.20 ares, which he derived as per A schedule in Ext.P1 Partition Deed. The Bank rejected the application for a loan as per Exts.P8 and P9, stating that the reverse mortgage loan cannot be sanctioned against partition deed as per the loan policy of the Bank. Though the petitioner approached the Banking Ombudsman, the Banking Ombudsman refused to interfere as per Ext.P12.
2. I heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri. B. Mohan Lal, and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 to 3, Sri. Jawahar Jose.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that the property derived by the petitioner as per Ext.P1 partition deed is duly mutated in the name of the petitioner and he
The ownership of property is valid irrespective of whether it is ancestral or self-acquired, impacting loan eligibility.
A property gifted does not become ancestral solely by inheritance; the transferor's intent and legal characterization of the property matter. Petitioners lacked enforceable rights to prevent sale.
A claimant must prove the ancestral nature of properties to claim entitlement under the amended Hindu Succession Act; mere assertions without evidence are insufficient.
The plea of adverse possession and title raised simultaneously is inconsistent and contradictory.
A co-sharer’s right to ancestral property is inherent and cannot be extinguished by absence from the parental home.
(1) Hindu Law – Partition – After joint family property has been distributed in accordance with law, it ceases to be joint family properties and shares of respective parties become their self-acquire....
A mortgage executed by a natural guardian without court permission is voidable against minors, and the limitation period for challenging such a mortgage is governed by Article 59 of the Limitation Ac....
A lease executed prior to the Malabar Tenancy Act is treated as a fresh lease, influencing property characterization in relations of self-acquired versus ancestral ownership.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
