VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Forest Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Uaipur – Appellant
Versus
Kanna – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present batch of writ petitions arise out of the orders passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Udaipur and the Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer having similar facts, therefore, the writ petitions are being heard and decided finally by this common order.
3. The facts of Writ Petition No. 10775/2015 (Forest Department, Udaipur v. Smt. Meena & Ors.) are being taken into consideration while deciding the present batch of writ petitions.
4. Brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the Forest Department, Udaipur preferred this writ petition being aggrieved of the Allotment Order dated 21.11.1974 passed by Sub-Divisional Officer, Udaipur (Annexure-4), Order dated 17.12.2007 passed by Urban Improvement Trust, Udaipur (Annexure-6) under Section 90B of Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the "the Act"), Order dated 25.11.2013 passed by Divisional Commissioner, Udaipur (Annexure-8), and the order dated 04.12.2014 passed by the Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer (Annexure-9).
5. The Forest Department, Udaipur basically approached this Court by way of filing the present writ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.