SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2273

DINESH MEHTA
Vijya Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
D.S. Udawat, Advocate, Mahipal Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Mehta, J. - Present application has been filed by the applicant - petitioner No.3 - Mukesh Jain, seeking extension of time to appear before the trial Court and furnish bail bond and sureties pursuant to the order dated 16.03.2022 passed by this Court in SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1355/2022.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that while partly allowing the misc. petition filed by the petitioners vide order dated 16.03.2022, this Court directed the present applicant - petitioner No.3 - Mukesh Jain to appear before the trial Court on or before 30.04.2022 and furnish bail bond of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant - petitioner No.3 - Mukesh Jain was at Mali africa and could not come to India due to COVID protocols/restrictions and hence could not appear before the trial Court and furnish the requisite bail bond and sureties by 30.04.2022 as stipulated in the order dated 16.03.2022. Thus, a prayer has been made to extend the time to appear before the trial Court and furnish requisite bail bond and sureties.

4. For the reasons stated, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top