Sunil Jain vs State of M. P. - 2021 Supreme(MP) 107

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(MP) 107

VISHAL MISHRA
Sunil Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sanjay Gupta, Learned Counsel
For the Respondent: Uma Kushwaha, Learned Panel Lawyer and Ankit Saxena, Learned Counsel

JUDGMENT :

Vishal Mishra, J.

1. Heard on I.A. No. 1989/2021, an application under Section 301(1) of Cr.P.C. for assisting the PL during hearing of the matter. For the reasons mentioned therein, the same is hereby allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the complainant is permitted to assist the PL during hearing.

3. Learned counsel for the rival parties are heard.

4. This is first bail application u/S. 438 Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant for grant of bail.

5. In the wake of unprecedented and uncertain situation due to outbreak of the Novel Corona virus (COVID-19) and considering the advisories issued by the Government of India, this application has been heard and decided through video conferencing to maintain social distancing. The parties are being represented by the respective counsels through video conferencing, following the norms of social distancing/physical distancing in letter and spirit.

6. The applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 10/2021, registered by police station Huzrat Kotwali, District Gwalior, in relation to the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467 and 468 of IPC.

7. It is the submission of learned counsel for applicant that applicant has falsely

Click Here to Read the rest of this document