SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1762

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N. K. Soni, Advocate, Hemant Jain, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

S.B. Criminal Misc. Interim Bail application No. 240/2022:-

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's wife is suffering from ovarian cyst and she has to be a/w connected matter] operated upon. Therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on interim bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the interim bail application. Learned Public Prosecutor on verification of the petitioner has not found assertion made by the learned counsel for the petitioner to be correct. Learned Public Prosecutor further submits that there are other family members who can take care of the petitioner's wife.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the nature of accusation and gravity of the offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not inclined to grant interim bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner.

5. accordingly, the present interim bail application preferred by the petitioner under S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top