MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Lalaram Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER
1. Issue notice.
2. In view of the short controversy involved in the matter, this Court deems it just and proper to direct Mr. Pushpendra Singh Naruka, learned counsel to accept notices on behalf of the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order impugned dated 15.12.2020, the petitioner, a Head Constable, was placed under suspension on account of his arrest in a case by the Anti Corruption Bureau, Tonk but, even after lapse of more than a year, the suspension order has not been reviewed.
4. Relying on the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. reported in 2015 (7) SCC 291, learned counsel submitted that the respondents are required to review the order of suspension periodically and prays that the respondents be directed to revisit the order dated 15.12.2020.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer and submits that they would review the suspension order dated 15.12.2020 within a period of four weeks.
6. The Hon'ble Apex Court has in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary (Supra) has held as under:-
'21.We, therefore, direct that the currency of a suspension order sh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.