SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1000

VIJAY BISHNOI
Vedpal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hamir Singh Sidhu, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.830/2022 of P.S. Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangarh for the offences punishable under Sections 332 and 353 I.P.C. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Vedpal S/o Sh. Balram Godara shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.830/2022 of P.S. Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangarh provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/-each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the comple

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top