SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2712

VIJAY BISHNOI
Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vinod Sharma, Advocate, Ashok Bishnoi, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.40/2017 of Police Station Bhojasar, District Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15 and 29 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this third bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the earlier bail application of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that one more case of NDPS Act is pending against him in the State of Madhya Pradesh. It is also submitted that in the said case, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh has enlarged the petitioner on bail vide order dated 30.11.2022. It is further submitted that no recovery of narcotic contraband has been effected from the petitioner and all the other co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail, therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application, however, submitted that even though the petitioner has been enlarged on bail in another case of NDPS Act by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh but t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top