SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1714

FARJAND ALI
Munshi Adivasi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Parikshit Nayak.
For the Respondent: Abhishek Purohit.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments related to sentencing and appellant's background. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court analysis regarding conviction and sentencing rationale. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. modification of the sentence based on previous findings. (Para 11)
5. conclusion and disposition of the appeal. (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT :

FARJAND ALI, J.

1. The appellant has preferred the instant appeal under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. being aggrieved of the judgment dated 20.04.2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Banswara in Sessions Case No. 95/2008, whereby he has been convicted and sentenced in the following manner:

Offence for which convicted

Sentence, fine and default sentence

Section 459 of the IPC

3 years’ simple imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo, simple imprisonment of 15 days

Section 323 of the IPC

6 months’ simple imprisonment

Section 325 of the IPC

1 year's simple imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs. 200/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo, simple imprisonment of 10 days

Section 427

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top