SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1790

ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Amit Sogani – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ashvin Garg
For the Respondent: S.K. Mahala
For the Complainant : Arvind Sharma, Mamta Agrawal

ORDER :

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 419/2019 registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 471 & 120B of IPC.

2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that with regard to property in question, three different FIRs have been lodged in the same police station. In FIR No. 246/2020, petitioner has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submits that quasi-judicial proceedings were also initiated before the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies under Section 58 of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, in which Sub-Registrar, Co-operative Societies categorically stated in its judgment that Shankar Singh and Nitin Mishra are the owners of the disputed property. It is further submitted that all the three persons who lodged three different FIRs were party in these proceedings. Learned counsel contends t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top