SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1345

MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Mohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Vimla Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Tribhuvan Gupta
For the Respondent: Mr. Himanshu Maheshwari

JUDGMENT :

Madan Gopal Vyas, J.

The instant civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed under Section 22 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (for short, Act of 1950) by the appellant-tenant against the order dated 03.07.2003 passed by learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track No. 2), Bhilwara (hereinafter referred to as the learned Trial Court) in Civil Suit No. 17/2003 whereby learned Trial Court determined the provisional rent of the rented premises at the rate of Rs. 1500/- per month.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-tenant submits that the impugned order passed by the learned Trial Court is contrary to the settled principles of law. It is submitted that as per Section 13(3) of the Act of 1950, the provisional rent is to be determined after hearing both the parties. However, in the instant case, learned Trial Court proceeded ex-parte as the counsel could not appear for 1-2 hours as he was attending some other Court. It is further submitted that the learned Trial Court failed to consider the material available on record. It is submitted that the appellant filed his written statement along with the rent receipts, which were on record. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top