Honble CHAUHAN, J.–The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 22.4.1988 contained in Annexure 8 to the petition by which the services of the petitioner had been terminated. The factual gamut of the case as revealed by the record is that petitioner was appointed as Gram Sewak (V.L.W.) on 18.1.1985 on purely temporary basis for a period of 29 days or till the regularlyselected candidates are made available by the District Establishment Committee (hereinafter called D.E.C.). The services of the petitioner were extended several times for a period of 29 days and it came to an end in July 1986. As the regular selected candidates were not made available by D.E.C. petitioner was given appointment vide order dated 6.10.1986 contained in Annexure 2 to the petitionfor a period of six months purely on temporary basis and there has been no further extension of his services. However, petitioner claims that he continued to work without any extension of his services and he has been removed from service vide impugned order dated 22.4.1988.

(2). Being aggrieved and dissatisfied, petitioner has challenged the impugnedorder dated 22.4.1988 mainly on the ground that there was a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document