SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 373

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
ARVIND KUMAR @ SUKHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
SOSA / 403 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Jitendra Ojha, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG, Mr. K.S. Kumpawat, AAAG

Suspension of sentence is justified when the contraband is below commercial quantity and the appellant was on bail during trial.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 389(2) - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Suspension of sentence - The court found that the recovered contraband was below commercial quantity and the appellant was on bail during the trial, justifying the suspension of the sentence pending appeal. (Paras 2, 4)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The appellant must execute a personal bond and provide sureties, with specific conditions regarding appearance and change of address. (Paras 4)

Facts of the case:
The appellant, convicted under the N.D.P.S. Act, sought suspension of sentence due to the nature of the contraband and his bail status during trial.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the suspension of the sentence, emphasizing the appellant's compliance with bail conditions.

Issues: The main issue was whether the sentence should be suspended given the circumstances of the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the nature of the contraband and the appellant's bail status warranted suspension of the sentence until the appeal's resolution.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

Order :

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Advocate General. Perused the material available on record.

2. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the facts that recovered contraband is below commercial quantity and the appellant was on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant.

3. Learned Additional Advocate General has opposed the prayer made by the counsel for the appellant.

4. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 430 (2) B.N.S.S. (389 of Cr.P.C .) is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act Cases, Sriganganagar, vide judgment dated 21.02.2025 in Special Sessions Case No.37/2019 against the appellant-applicant– Arvind Kumar @ Sukha S/o Vedprakash Bishnoi, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 24.04.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing her changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

5. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top