SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 261

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
Rohtas – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
CRLAS / 526 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Surendra Thanvi, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat

Suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is justified when the appeal's hearing is likely to take time, subject to compliance with specified bail conditions.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 389 - Suspension of sentence - Application for suspension of sentence allowed based on the likelihood of delay in the appeal process - The court ordered the suspension of the sentence awarded by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, subject to conditions including the execution of a personal bond. (Paras 7, 8)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - Accused must appear before the trial court annually and notify any changes in residence or surety address to the court. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The application for suspension of sentence was filed by the accused-applicant, Rohtas, following a conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, with a sentence imposed by the Special Judge. The court noted the appeal's expected duration as a factor in its decision.

Findings of Court:
The court found that it was appropriate to suspend the sentence until the appeal was resolved, allowing bail under specified conditions.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the circumstances warranted the suspension of the sentence pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the likelihood of a lengthy appeal justified the suspension of the sentence, emphasizing the necessity for the accused to comply with bail conditions to ensure their appearance.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

Order :

1. Heard.

2. Admit. Issue Notice.

3. Learned AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State.

4. Issue notice to respondent No.2, returnable within eight weeks.

5. Call for record.

6. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.

7. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced by the appellant(s) and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant(s).

8. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. [Section 430 BNSS] is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, District Hanumangarh vide judgment dated 11.02.2025 in Sessions Case No.44/2023 against the appellant-applicant(s) – Rohtas S/o Shri Satveer shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal and he/she/they shall be released on bail provided he/she/they executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his/her/their appearance in this court on 22.04.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

9. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) do not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top