Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Yogendra Kumar Purohit, J
Dinesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Order :
Yogendra Kumar Purohit, J
01- izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls vUrfje tekur dh vof/k c<+k;s tkus gsrq izkFkZuk i= la[;k 179@2025 izLrqr dj izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh tekur dh vof/k c<+k;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
02- ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd o ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dks lquk x;kA miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
03- iwoZ esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vUrfje tekur izkFkZuk i= fnukad 14-01-2025 dks Lohdkj dj izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnus'k flag iq= /kksdyflag dks iqfyl Fkkuk dqM+h Hkxrkluh] ftyk tks/kiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 375@2023 esa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djkus dh 'krZ ij fjgkbZ dh rkjh[k ls fnukad 25 fnu dh vof/k ds fy, vUrfje tekur ij fjgk fd;k x;k Fkk] ysfdu mDr vof/k esa vfHk;qDr dh iRuh dk vkWijs'ku ugha gks ik;k Fkk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls varfje tekur dh vof/k c<+k;s tkus dk izkFkZuk i= is'k dj MkWDVj dh iphZ ds vuqlkj lkr fnu ckn vkWijs'ku dk fy[kk gksus ls varfje tekur dh vof/k c<+k;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k] ftl ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk varfje tekur dh vof/k c<+kus dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj tekur dh vof/k dks iqu% m
The court mandates timely scheduling of medical procedures, emphasizing administrative obligations to ensure patient welfare.
The court established that serious charges require substantial evidence for bail consideration, emphasizing the need for careful judicial scrutiny in such matters.
Judicial actions must comply with statutory requirements to ensure validity and enforceability.
Administrative actions must strictly adhere to statutory provisions and fall within the lawful authority granted to the administrative body.
Fair trial principles necessitate the transfer of cases when local influences threaten impartiality, ensuring judicial integrity.
The court affirmed the legality of administrative actions taken under statutory provisions, emphasizing adherence to established laws.
The principles of just compensation and the need to fully restore the aggrieved to their pre-accident position under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The central legal point established in this judgment is that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, and the burden of proof shifts to the defenda....
The court ruled that actions taken under the law must comply with statutory requirements to be valid.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
