Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
GANESH RAM MEENA, J
JILSAD S/O ISSAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
Order :
1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.256/2024 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for offences under Sections 303(2), 308(2), 313, 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2)(a) of B.N.S. and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 .
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and they are in custody since 10.11.2024. Counsel further submits that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioners are no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. Counsel further submits that no other criminal case is pending against the petitioners in view of the order of the court below, therefore, they may be released on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners so also the fact that Police
Bail should be granted when there is no ongoing investigation or need for interrogation, and no other criminal cases pending against the accused.
The court granted bail considering the nature of charges, lengthy detention, and the status of co-accused already released on bail.
Bail granted based on completed investigation, absence of criminal record, and co-accused already released on bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
