Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA, J
Hanuman Sahai Meena Son of Rameshwar Prasad Meena – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Order :
1. The present criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023 for quashing and setting aside the FIR No.721/2023 (dated 29.11.2023) registered at Police Station Bassi (Jaipur City (East)), District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 452, 379, 427 & 307 of IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel appearing for the complainant submit that a compromise has arrived at between the parties and they have amicably settled their dispute, therefore, FIR No.721/2023 (dated 29.11.2023) registered at Police Station Bassi (Jaipur City (East)), District Jaipur City (East), be quashed and set aside.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments and the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the complainant acknowledges the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties and on instructions from the complainant, states that the complainant has no objection if the impugned FIR in question alongwith all consequential proceedings against the present accused-petitioners are quashed and set aside.
5. Considered the submissions made at bar an
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, prioritizing justice and practicality over the formalities of compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes, even for non-compoundable offences, to prevent futile litigation and secure justice.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing serves the ends of justice, distinct from compounding offences.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes amicably, emphasizing the distinction between quashing and compounding offences.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing the distinction from compounding offences and focusing on the ends of justice.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, even for non-compoundable offences, if it serves the ends of justice.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences and is guided by the ends of justice.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their dispute, and continuation would serve no useful purpose, particularly in cases with a civil flavor.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on private compromise when the nature of the offences is such that continuation would lead to oppression or injustice, particularly in civil-center....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
