Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA, J
Baldev Ram Son of Shri Bhuraram Jat – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
GANESH RAM MEENA, J.
1. The present criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR No. 91/2006 registered on 18.09.2006 at Police Station Ropangarh, District Ajmer for offences punishable u/S 147, 365, 342, 323 & 427 IPC and all consequential proceedings.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the complainant submit that a compromise has arrived at between the parties and they have submitted an application before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kishangarh on 28.01.2025 to attest the compromise. However, the learned trial Court attested the compromise as regards the offences u/S 342, 323, 325, 427 IPC and rejected the same as regards the offence u/S 147 & 324 IPC observing that the trial is pending.
3. Heard.
4. The parties, after removing their bad blood, have entered into a compromise and they have submitted an application before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kishangarh on 28.01.2025 to attest the compromise, wherein the complainant party has stated that they do not want any further proceedings in the matter.
5. The learned trial Court vid
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, even for non-compoundable offences, if it serves the ends of justice.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, prioritizing justice and practicality over the formalities of compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes, even for non-compoundable offences, to prevent futile litigation and secure justice.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences and is guided by the ends of justice.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing serves the ends of justice, distinct from compounding offences.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes amicably, emphasizing the distinction between quashing and compounding offences.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing the distinction from compounding offences and focusing on the ends of justice.
The court can exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash criminal proceedings based on compromise, in line with the guidelines engrafted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
