IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
GANESH RAM MEENA
Sehdev Kaviya S/o Ganesh Dan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 B.N.S.S. for quashing of FIR No.37/2025 (dated 31.01.2025) registered at Police station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) for the offence punishable under Section 74 of the B.N.S. 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties have entered into compromise. Therefore, the impugned FIR and all consequential criminal proceedings may be quashed and set aside qua the present petitioner.
3. The Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.03.2025 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of the compromise and after verification, the Investigating Officer was to submit the verification report.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the parties have appeared before the Investigating Officer and the fact of compromise between the parties has been verified.
5. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.
6. The verification report as regards the compromise submitted by the Investigating Officer is taken on record.
7. A
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing the distinction from compounding offences and focusing on the ends of justice.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, prioritizing justice and practicality over the formalities of compounding offences.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences and is guided by the ends of justice.
The court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes, even for non-compoundable offences, to prevent futile litigation and secure justice.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing serves the ends of justice, distinct from compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes amicably, emphasizing the distinction between quashing and compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, even for non-compoundable offences, if it serves the ends of justice.
The court may quash non-compoundable offences if a personal dispute is settled and public peace is not affected.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their dispute, and continuation would serve no useful purpose, particularly in cases with a civil flavor.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.