HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, BENCH AT JAIPUR
GANESH RAM MEENA
Forbus Industries, Through Partner Harish Bhalla – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Order :
(GANESH RAM MEENA, J.)
1. This criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing and setting aside the FIR No.568/2023 (dated 04.10.2023) registered at Police station Bhiwadi, District Bhiwadi for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 506 & 120-B IPC and all consequential criminal proceedings.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and they have settled their dispute so the criminal proceedings pending between them, be quashed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments and prayer made on behalf of the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the complainant acknowledges the factum of compromise between the parties and on instructions from the complainant states that the complainant has no objection if the proceedings of the impugned FIR in question alongwith all consequential criminal proceedings against the present accused- petitioners are quashed.
5. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant.
6. A perusal of the material on record shows that
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences and is guided by the ends of justice.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing the distinction from compounding offences and focusing on the ends of justice.
The court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes, even for non-compoundable offences, to prevent futile litigation and secure justice.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing serves the ends of justice, distinct from compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that such quashing is distinct from compounding offences.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, prioritizing justice and practicality over the formalities of compounding offences.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, even for non-compoundable offences, if it serves the ends of justice.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their disputes amicably, emphasizing the distinction between quashing and compounding offences.
The court may quash non-compoundable offences if a personal dispute is settled and public peace is not affected.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their dispute, and continuation would serve no useful purpose, particularly in cases with a civil flavor.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.